Where can I Invest my Proceeds from a SALE?

12 Jun

Image

What are MY Options?

DILEMMA

The market for Mergers and Acquisitions for quality private companies below $500 million in enterprise value is very strong and should continue through 2012.  Supply (availability of capital) and demand (quality companies ready to sell part or all of their equity) is out of balance today with much more supply than demand.  For many industries, valuations are back to pre-recession levels for strong companies with a solid management team and good growth story.  However, the window of opportunity to invest for the $330 BN of private equity funds closed on in 2007 begins to shut in 2013.  Click here to read more…

Owners frequently say they are receptive to taking some chips off the table but indicate their reluctance because of this question:

 “Where can I invest my sale proceeds that can give me a higher return than investing in my business?”

This is a very fair question BUT it is not the right question.

What Motivates YOU to SELL?

For a “founder”, the underlying issue may be giving up “control” which is an emotional issue not a financial one.  An attorney friend recently shared with me a story about a client in the Building Supply industry who was pursued by multiple buyers to sell in 2006.  He was offered $350 million for his company but elected not to sell because he was confident others would offer more. Today he is still around but just struggling to survive digging into his pockets to honor his personal guarantees securing his company debt.

Many would immediately respond that the reason the owner “walked” was “Greed”.  I disagree.  A recent study (Noam Wasserman and Timothy Butler – The Motivation Matrix) of 2,000 business founders were given 13 motivational traits to rank in order from the most to least important.  The TOP two motivations driving founders are AUTONOMY (cannot work for others – control) and POWER & INFLUENCE (likes to be the Boss).  Unfortunately, these founders rarely build large companies because they refuse to hire top-level employees where the owner must relinquish his power and control over their pet areas.  By contrast, according to Wasserman, those entrepreneurs that place FINANCIAL GAIN near the top of the list ended up with an equity stake 52% more valuable on average than those who ranked AUTONOMY/POWER & INFLUENCE first (“Rich vs King Dilemma”).

INVESTING in your Business

This may be the BEST option but you must analyze it objectively. What is the real return of investing in your business versus the risk associated with it?  To evaluate this let’s look at five market influencers –

  1. Interest Rates
  2. Inflation
  3. Globalization
  4. Technology
  5. Demographics

Interest Rates:  The Federal Reserve Chairman did NOT announce last week the third round of “Quantitative Easing” (another term for printing money) to keep interest rates low to create a positive environment to support the economic recovery but he did not rule out the possibility in the future if the EURO Zone deteriorates further.  It previously announced that it intends to end this policy by 2014 allowing rates to be determined by market forces versus government intervention.  WHAT happens then? (Hint: It is hard for rates to go below zero)

If rates do rise, how will it affect your value?

  1. Borrowing costs for your company, customers and potential acquirers will go up.  This reduces your cash flow and makes it more difficult for buyers to pay as much and meet their return expectations (this frequently results in a lower valuation).
  2. It has a negative impact on GDP since more resources will go to service debt versus being invested in growth.  It also will increase the need of Government to collect more revenues (pressure to raise taxes) and it can put a damper on economic growth. This tends to make business owners hesitant to hire additional employees and expand in uncertain economic times. (i.e. current woes in the EURO Zone)

Inflation:  Currently it is not a factor, global economies are struggling on how to prevent a double dip recession (many believe Europe is already in a recession) and reverse the effects of “deflation”.  However, the sovereign debt crises of the US will have to be addressed.  It is estimated to reach approximately $16 Trillion in 2012.  This debt burden coupled with the coming huge expenditures to support the aging US population will definitely put upward pressure on inflation in 2014 and beyond (SEE Chart below).

Globalization: You use to compete with the firm across town.  Today you compete with firms from Asia, India, South Africa, and all over the globe.  You cannot ignore international opportunities and threats in the future and be prepared to act.  Is the health of the U.S.’s key trading partners important to you? YES!  Collectively the EURO Zone is our largest partner and if they are in a severe recession they cannot (or will not) buy as many products and services from U.S. companies.

Technology:  It has changed every industry and the way we live our lives.  It is facilitating change at a speed never seen before.  Ten years ago did you foresee corporate names like Eastman Kodak, Blockbuster, and Borders Books disappearing?  We had not heard of household names like: “Nook” or “Kindle”, iPad, and “Cloud Computing”.  If you are not familiar with “Moore’s Law” then follow the link.  As a business owner you must keep pace with technology advances because your competitors will.

Demographics: The chart below says it all.  The U.S. like most of the industrialized countries in the world have a Sub-Replacement Fertility Rate (less than 2.1 births for every female in the population) and this has been occurring every year but 2 years since 1976.  On  January 1, 2011, Baby Boomers began turning 65 at the rate of 12,000+ per day and will continue to so through 2030.  This will double the percent of the population reaching retirement age and receiving entitlement benefits such Medicare, Social Security, etc. while the percentage of those between 25 and 65 of age (wage earning years) are declining by approximately the same percentage.  There is no reserve fund set aside to pay for this so the government will have to borrow to meet these obligations.

US Aging Trend

Effect on Your Company:  What will higher interest rates, inflation, globalization and technology have on the value of your business and Middle Market M&A activity?  For starters the first two will increase the cost of borrowing for your company and acquirers desiring to buy your company.  How will the more stringent lending practices and higher rates affect consumers and their ability and willingness to borrow to buy your products or services?  If these cause a slowdown in your company’s growth and the confidence of buyers about where your business will be in the future, it can translate into a lower value.

If you are convinced that your business is recession resilient AND you still have the fire in your gut – then use this opportunity to expand by creating additional products/services, distribution channels and/or acquisition of competitors or other synergistic targets to strengthen your position for when the economy recovers. 

The facts are:

  1. Only approximately one-third of family owned businesses will successfully pass to the second generation, 12% to the third and 3% to the fourth according to the Small Business Administration statistics.
  2. Some experts’ estimate as high as 70% of those failing to transfer will liquidate because of insolvency or the owner ceases operations and sells the assets!
  3. The remaining businesses are sold to third parties.

Regardless of what you decide to do, explore other options that can protect your family and employees to provide for an orderly succession but will not necessarily maximize your purchase price because it is a non-competitive process.  None of us mortals can beat father time but we can plan for an orderly transition of the business.

Non-market (non-competitive process) types of exits are:

  1. ESOP (Employee Stock Ownership Plan)
  2. Transition to Family
  3. Management Buyout
  4. Liquidation (most likely)

Is  FINANCIAL GAIN a key Motivation for YOU?

For those owners where wealth creation is a high priority and you would like to:

  1. De-risk your personal financial picture (i.e. remove yourself from personal guarantees of company debt)
  2. Not have to invest in new facilities and technology to keep up with global competitors
  3. Hedge your bets or retire by capturing some or all of the value you have created
  4. Maximize your purchase price in this “seller’s market” window

If you answered YES to the above desires and are psychologicaly prepared to separate from your company, you should take the following steps ASAP:

  1. HIRE the best professionals possible who are expert in succession planning to assist in creating an EXIT PLAN (this will be more than one person but you should have a team leader coordinating the efforts).
  2. Develop a plan to prepare for a sale of part or all of your company as soon as practicable (2012 if possible)

Your planning will need to include both YOUR personal objectives and those to prepare and execute a Sale of the business. Your planning will include multiple disciplines;

  • Succession Planning
  • Accounting & Legal
  • Wealth Management and Planning
  • Strategic Planning
  • M&A Market knowledge
  • Transaction Execution Expertise (MUST create competitive tension)

The lead adviser (coordinator) should have a complete picture and be experienced in the planning and process. The M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC can assist with referrals if desired.

WHAT Should I to DO WITH MY SALE Proceeds?

We finally get to the Title subject! Hopefully you have followed the above advice and have selected an expert in wealth management to help in creating your plan. Most good money managers will tell you, their job is not to match the growth in value (or take the RISK) you did in building your company, their objective is to preserve what you worked so hard to build.  Your decision is:

“Do you want the responsibility of managing your sale proceeds OR do you HIRE a professional to do it for you?”

Robert Balentine, CEO of Balentine, LLC a respected wealth management firm,  recently gave an excellent presentation to a group of Vistage CEO’s outlining in a simple chart the reasons business owners, who are use to controlling their world,  have a hard time turning what they worked a career building over to a third party.

Wealth Creation Stages

There is huge “Uncertainty” about the global economy, especially the EURO zone (the U.S.’s largest trading partner) and the possibility of its woes putting the U.S. back into recession. The options for investing are limitless and confusing with huge pitfalls for the inexperienced.  No longer can you Buy and Hold (“on”) in the age of 24/7 trading hours and computer trades where trading algorithms can cause a 700 point drop in the DOW in minutes when certain triggers are hit.

Potential OPTIONS for INVESTING the PROCEEDS

 

Remember, the goal of a professional wealth manager is NOT to make you a fortune, it is to preserve the one YOU made!  Warren Buffet did not become the most successful investor on the globe by taking wild risks – he did it by avoiding them!

Buffet Secret

Note:  Buffet’s gains in positive periods were slightly below the S&P 500 (93.9%) BUT outperformed them in down periods by limiting his loss to only 37.8% of the S&P 500.  The result were annualized returns of 15.9%, 2.24 X the 7.1% return for the index!

Below are the raw returns compiled by the U.S. Treasury Department  since 1928 through 2011 for Stocks, T-Bills (3 month maturity) and T-Bonds (10 year maturity) the average annual compound return for each category was 9.35%, 3.66% and 5.20% respectively. Below is a summary of the returns for the periods following the two worst depression/recessions in U.S. history.

U.S. Stock, T-Bill & T-Bond Market Performance

  5 Years 10 Years 20 Years Average Compound Annual Return (1929-2011)
Post Great Depression (1932)        
    Stocks 12.43% 7.92% 11.28% 9.35%
    T-Bills 0.38% 0.25% 0.05% 3.66%
    T-Bonds 4.04% 3.39% 2.79% 5.20%
         
Post Arab Oil Embargo (1974)        
    Stocks 13.86% 13.72% 13.59% 9.35%
    T-Bills 6.39% 8.39% 6.98% 3.66%
    T-Bonds 3.91% 6.90% 8.35% 5.20%

Stocks outperformed their historic average return after both of these down periods.  It is interesting to note that after a prolonged period of “deflation” (Great Depression) stocks performed roughly the same as the “inflationary” period following the Arab Oil Embargo (except for 10 year period post 1932).

Alternative Investment Options:

The Investment Management field is one of the fastest growing business areas and investing today is more complicated than ever. In an attempt to show how professionals in this arena can make a difference, the author has selected a portfolio strategy that he found during his research that was created in the early 1980’s to provide the investor long term market returns without the volatility. Please see the disclaimer at the end of the blog about the opinions and statistics of others. The following approach was useful to see how one manager has attempted to create the perfect “Permanent Portfolio”.  Though allocation among four asset classes this strategy attempts to provide protection as the economy shifts between cycles of prosperity, inflation, deflation and recession. The four classes are:

  1. 1.      25% Stocks – Total Stock Market Index Fund (TSM)
  2. 2.      25% Cash – Treasury Short Term Bonds (1 – 2 years)
  3. 3.      25% Treasury Long Term Bonds (20+ years)
  4. 4.      25% Gold Bullion

Going back 40 years (1972) using this methodology the creators (Harry Browne, deceased, Terry Coxon and John Chandler) claim an average return over that period of 9.7%.  This is roughly the same performance of “stocks” compiled by the US Treasury over the same period BUT what stands out is the “Permanent Portfolio” only shows losses in two years and greatly reduced year to year fluctuations.  Two of the creator’s of the above “Permanent Portfolio” strategy started a mutual fund called The Permanent Portfolio Fund (Ticker: PRPFX) in 1981 that demonstrate the fund’s success at limiting the magnitude of losses in down markets. (Example: in 2008 the fund claims a positive 1.9% return when stocks lost approximately 40% of their value)

Please forgive this long-winded explanation to try and address what may not be your real concern – giving up control, of your company and investment decisions.  If wealth creation is a key motivator then hopefully some of this is helpful.

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as advice on any particular matter nor is it intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship.  For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com.

Link

WHO Pays the highest Purchase PRICE – Strategic or Financial Buyer?

2 Jun

By Huxley Nixon

Conventional wisdom has always been the Strategic buyer could pay more because of the potential to “rationalize” the less efficient or duplicate functions of the target company.   Frequently this meant firing most of the employees and selling or closing most of the target’s facilities.  A strategic buyer usually desires 80% to 100% of the equity and it is definitely not interested in less than a control equity position unless it is to acquire access to intellectual property or expansion into additional markets.  It virtually never is interested in the personal wealth creation of the Seller other than appreciation of any stock of the acquirer they may have taken as part of the purchase price.

On the-other-hand, Financial buyers such as private equity groups (“PEG”) usually are seeking strong “platform” companies to buy and grow and exit in three to five years.  They desire and need….Read More…

WHAT destroys your EXIT Value but you CANNOT control it?

23 May

When Should I SELL?


By:  Huxley Nixon

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                

“It” universally affects a buyer’s willingness to invest, a lender’s willingness to lend and a seller’s to sell. Unfortunately, NONE of these constituencies have the power to change its momentum! It is a cancer no form of government or geographic region is immune from and it paralyses our financial markets.  WHAT IS IT?

Hint:  It is related to RISK.

BUYERS:

If you are a successful company but not sure customers will continue to buy your product or service it keeps you from investing in new inventory, plant or equipment and frequently prompts management to lay off employees.  It affects your decision to acquire others that in normal times would be logical actions and accretive to your bottom line.

LENDERS:

This group makes loans to others based on the expectation they will be repaid their principal and interest based on the Five C’s of Credit –

Capacity/Collateral/Capital/Conditions/Character

How did the near collapse of the financial system in late 2008 affect the ability of new borrowers to get a loan today?  Lenders have more availability of FUNDS to lend but few loans are being made and borrowers are hesitant to borrow.  WHY?

SELLERS:

Business Owners remember the heady valuations being offered prior to the Great Recession but few pulled the trigger and sold.  Family business owners were hit especially hard because selling is also an EMOTIONAL decision, NOT just a financial one.  Many founders ask themselves – “What will I do after I sell? Unfortunately, in many instances their company has become their identity and they cannot envision not being part of it.  Financial Gain is NOT the key motivation driving them in most cases so they elect to do nothing and do not plan well for this eventuality.  We all know someone whose business was flying high in 2007 but if they were in the building supply arena Chapter 7 liquidation was the outcome for many when ALL construction came to an abrupt halt in 2009.  Not a GOOD outcome.

Fast forward three and half years and the majority of owners who survived the worst, have stabilized their companies and are growing again but may not have reached their pre-recession high water mark.  The almost universal response when asked about selling part or all of their company today is:

Why not wait five years until things settle down and valuations return to normal?

WHAT THREE FACTORS DETERMINE VALUE?  

1)      INTERNAL:         (You control creating these value drivers)

  • Strong Management TEAM and Company Culture
  • Excellent Financial/Management controls and Operating systems
  • Diversified Customer Base
  • Investing in new technology advances and capital improvements
  • Strong Sales and Cash Flow
  • Recurring Revenue business model
  • Three Year rolling Strategic Plan positioning Company for GROWTH – reviewed annually

 

2)      EXTERNAL:   Unfortunately, you do NOT control these.  

·         MARKET Influence

  • Supply & Demand
  • Governmental Regulation and Policy
  • Tax Rates and Rules 
  • US and Global Economy
  •  Money Supply
  • Inflation and Interest Rates
  • Access to Capital
  • Investor Confidence about the future
  • Political INSTABILITY, UNREST & WAR
  • Terrorism
  • Natural Disasters

·         DEMOGRAPHICS

·         GLOBALIZATION

·         TECHNOLOGY ADVANCES

 

3)      SALES PROCESS:          (You can control this)

  • Hire the BEST professionals possible who are expert in dealing with Succession/EXIT Planning issues and develop a PLAN
  • Execute the PLAN
  • When ready, select a Transaction process that creates a COMPETITIVE TENSION!

CARDINAL RULE

NEVER DO A NEGOTIATED DEAL WITH ONLY ONE BUYER!

In my 35+ year business career, two things usually happen when there is NO competitive tension created:

  • LOWER Sale PRICE – 20% to 30+%
  • TERMS more favorable to the Buyer (they typically have greater resources and are more experienced in the Mergers and Acquisition process – an Owner sells only ONCE)

Lastly, the single MOST IMPORTANT thing affecting the THREE Factors mentioned above is –

UNCERTAINTY

We can deal with BAD News and GOOD News but UNCERTAINTY paralyses us and the Market!

All of the above factors have an influence on YOUR value.  In upcoming blogs, the author will examine in detail the IMPACT in 2012 and 2013 & beyond, of four KEY EXTERNAL forces potentiality creating dramatic UNCERTAINTY and lower exit value.  They are:

1.      Supply and Demand (Access to Capital & Demographics)

2.      Tax Environment

3.      Globalization

4.      Technology Advances

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as advice on any particular matter nor is it intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship.  For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com

Why did you start your company?

2 Mar

By Huxley Nixon

Is it in your DNA?

Leigh Buchanan’s article in the March 2012 issue of INC. magazine, The Motivation Matrix, summarizes the findings of a fascinating study by two Harvard Business School faculty members who surveyed 2,000 founders and approximately the same number of non entrepreneurs about their motivations.  In an effort to better understand the motivations driving founders to start businesses, identify what they want out of life and how these change over time, respondents were asked to rank 13 motivations from the Most to Least influential.

Entrepreneurs are from Mars and Non Entrepreneurs are from Venus!

The study by Noam Wasserman and Timothy Butler revealed one of the key attributes about entrepreneurs is that they predominately make decisions with both their head and their heart.  The study looked at gender and those in the following age groups, 20’s, 30’s and 40’s plus.  With the exception of the over 40 age group for women, both men and women entrepreneurs of all age groups ranked AUTONOMY first and POWER & INFLUENCE  second.  By contrast, non-entrepreneurs ranked SECURITY and a CONGENIAL WORK ENVIRONMENT as their top two motivations.

Mergers and Acquisitions will experience huge growth over the next decade with the Boomer demographic turning 65 at the rate of 14,000 per day.  It is estimated that approximately 6 to 8 million Boomers own businesses and only about one-third will transition to family, employees, or third parties.   Businesses not sustainable after the founder’s departure will close their doors.  Others estimate in total there are approximately 10 million private businesses in the U.S. that represent approximately 60% of U.S. Gross Domestic Product and Labor Force, $8.75 Trillion and 92.6 million respectfully.   To understand how best to approach this difficult to reach segment of business owners to help them prepare for their inevitable exit, understanding what motivates them is critical.

The top seven Motivations selected by entrepreneurs (ranked from Most to Least Important) are:

  1. AUTONOMY
  2. POWER & INFLUENCE
  3. MANAGING PEOPLE
  4. FINANCIAL GAIN
  5. ALTRUISM
  6. VARIETY
  7. INTELLECTUAL CHALLENGE

Rich versus King Dilemma

Knowing these drivers helps identify an owner who is more likely to be a candidate willing to sell part or all of their company.  I frequently ask an owner which is more important to them: Wealth Creation or Control?  If it is control, they usually are not a good candidate to enter into a transaction where they have to give up control, regardless of the potential financial gain. Unfortunately, these companies rarely grow to be large companies because the owner refuses to hire top-level employees where the owner must relinquish his power and control over his pet areas.  By contrast, according to Wasserman, those entrepreneurs that place FINANCIAL GAIN near the top of the list ended up with an equity stake 52% more valuable on average than those who ranked AUTONOMY/POWER & INFLUENCE first (“Rich vs King Dilemma”).  See Inc. magazine article by Leigh Buchanan….

Two Iconic Entrepreneurs of Our Time

The best way to understand this Dilemma is to look at what were the driving motivations of two iconic Technology Entrepreneurs of the last forty years – STEVE JOBS and BILL GATES.  Both were motivated by AUTONOMY and POWER but also pragmatic in that they knew they had to bring in outside investors to launch their dreams.  Bill Gates was also motivated by FINANCIAL GAIN and was willing to license his Windows operating software to others manufacturing the computer hardware where Apple (JOBS) refused to do so.  Apple created a fully integrated solution for the user requiring them to buy all hardware and software from Apple.  More importantly this closed architecture meant other popular software applications in the 1980’s (i.e. Lotus spreadsheet) that businesses wanted could not be used on the Apple and Mac computers.  Yes, Steve Jobs was an unbelievable visionary who reinvented Apple upon his return in 1997 after being forced out ten years earlier and created the most valuable company on the planet (and died with an estate estimated to be $8+ Billion) but Bill Gates won the computer war and became the RICHEST person in the world (estimated net worth $56 BN).

Both Icons wanted to “Change the World”.  Gates used his gifts to build a massive fortune (“RICH”) and through his Charitable Foundation he is dedicated to bringing innovations in health, development, and learning to the global community.  Jobs (“KING”) was not motivated by money but is hailed for his genius and true achievement: his ability to blend product design and business market innovation by integrating consumer-oriented software, microelectronic components, industrial design and new business strategies in a way that has not been matched.  Click here to see the lost video of Jobs introducing “MACINTOSH” in 1984 – he was not introducing a computer, rather a way for us to “Think Different”! Oh WOW, Oh WOW, Oh WOW! (Steve Jobs last words)

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as advice on any particular matter nor is it intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship.  For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com.

M&A TRENDS for Lower Middle Market Q3 2011

5 Dec

By Huxley Nixon

According to sources such as Merger Stat Review, Flashwire Monthly, GF Data, Capital IQ and others, transactions with an enterprise value between $25M and $250M, deal activity and valuations are UP slightly but uncertainty continues to hang over the market due to Euro Debt crisis and the paralysis in Washington to deal with the huge US deficit and the jobless recovery.

FACTS (as of SEP 30, 2011)

  1. ACTIVITY:   UP 2.25% (TTM  1,083 transaction vs 1,059 prior TTM)
  2. CAVEAT:  Deals between $10M to $25M are DOWN 17%  BUT those between $250M to $500M are UP 45%
  3. EBITDA Multiple:   6.4X – UP (deals with TEV to TTM EBITDA between $10M and $250M, source GF Data)
  4. Size PREMIUM gap greatest in years!
  5. HOT Sectors: Industrials 26.8%, Consumer (discretionary) 19.2% and Information Technology 22.6%.(closed Q3 deals)
  6. Huge CASH reserves by strategic buyers and Private Equity Groups that are eager to invest in and acquire quality companies.
  7. IMPROVING borrowing climate for larger transactions.

What does this mean for business owners considering a sale of part or all of their company but are scared this is a BAD time because they have NOT returned to their previous high water mark of pre recession days? 

Buyers willing to PAY UP for Companies with LOWER RISK profile!

  • Forget what you did four years ago, what did your company do the past 12 months?
  • Is there a CREDIBLE Growth story for foreseeable future?
  • Strong Management Team
  • Strong Financial controls and Operations systems.
  • Have a diversified customer base with stable revenues and EBITDA margins.

If revenues and EBITDA are up from the same 12 month period a year ago, your financial house is in order, and revenues are growing, you should be well positioned to take advantage of growth opportunities when the recovery occurs and attract MULTIPLE suitors.Companies that reach a certain scale usually have developed a strong middle management, have better financial systems and operational controls – thus in the eyes of a buyer and lender have LESS RISK! 

Would you like to take some Chips off the table but are NOT ready to RETIRE?

If your company is less than $100M in revenues a Leveraged Equity ReCap may be something you should consider.  See this link describing how this powerful structure might work for you.

 How READY is your Company for a Transaction?   

Are you positioned to attract multiple BUYERS in today’s market?  Click here to see how your company stacks up. 

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship. For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com.

WHO is the best buyer for MY Company?

7 Nov

By:  Huxley Nixon

Unfortunately, there is NO right answer for all situations.  It depends on many factors, but this discussion is limited to two types of third-party buyers: Strategic and Financial.  This blog does not address the issue of the buyer insisting the seller receive a portion of their purchase price in the form of an “earn-out” because both types of buyers employ them.

We focus on these third-party buyers because they are most likely to pay the highest price for your company.

STRATEGIC BUYERS

Who are they?

A strategic buyer is a company in your industry or with the desire to enter your industry to accelerate their growth by expanding their product offering and/or geographic reach.  They can be public or private, foreign or domestic and are seeking targets that will be accretive to their stock value immediately.  By efficiently and quickly adding new customers, revenues and intellectual property (if any) they can leverage their existing personnel and infrastructure by “rationalizing” (a nice word for eliminating) unneeded people and infrastructure of the acquired target while accelerating growth.

Strategic buyers can pay a higher price because they do not require many of your existing personnel and facilities (administrative, sales & marketing, and production staff; outdated plant and equipment; etc.).

What happens after the sale?

  • Strategic buyers will “rationalize” the acquired target by terminating the excess personnel and closing inefficient facilities to maximize their profit and accretive benefit to their stock value.
  • Your company “culture” will most surely disappear, but the employees who make the transition will have new opportunities for growth and career advancement in a larger organization.
  • As the seller, you will be expected to remain for an orderly transition period. However, strategic buyers are not interested in your future “wealth creation” other than that agreed upon in the purchase contract.

What do I need to know about strategic buyers in the current market?

Because of the cost savings associated with the termination of personnel and closing of facilities, your company is worth more to a strategic buyer than to one who will need your people, plant and equipment.

Strategic buyers still have approximately $1.2 trillion of dry powder on their balance sheets for acquisitions and they have been the most active buyer segment since 2008 (approximately 85% to 90%).

They are NOT interested in buying less than 100% of the selling company and are NOT interested in backing Management Buyouts or an equity recapitalization.  

Public strategic buyers are not interested in smaller transactions and in general the “Size Premium” applies as it does for the Financial Buyer (see below).

PitchBook expects strategic buyers to be less active in 2012, but all US middle market merger and acquisition activity has slowed dramatically since July 2011, so this may change.

FINANCIAL BUYERS

Who are they?

Financial buyers are primarily private equity groups (“PEG’s”), but there are a growing number of alternative financial buyers, such as family offices, or public acquisition corporations.

Financial buyers bring access to financial resources and top industry talent to help the platform achieve its growth objectives, which could not have been achieved by the founder alone.

The days of the “buy and flip” financial buyer are gone!  Today’s buyer adds real value and does not rely on financial engineering to create a quick return as the Buyout firms of the 1980’s and 90’s did. Many of these transactions were over-leveraged, ending up in bankruptcy court if the company hit a bump. Today a financial buyer invests an average of 40%-50% in equity to close a transaction.

What happens after the sale?

  • Financial buyers make a profit by acquiring well-run companies with excellent growth potential that they can use as a “platform” to build upon to maximize the arbitrage available to larger companies upon a sale (see “Size Premium” study results by GF Data below).
  • Unlike a strategic buyer, they align management’s interests with theirs (through performance-based stock options and other equity incentives) and are eager to back quality management teams in Management Buyouts, Leveraged Buyouts and to support CEO/Owners that desire to remain and execute a growth plan and have a second bite of the apple.
  • Financial buyers grow “platform” businesses through acquisitions and/or organic sales growth and then exit through an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”), sale to a third-party (frequently to another PEG) or to management.
  • The average time to acquire, grow and exit a platform investment has grown from 3 to 5.2 years since 2008.

Financial buyers are great at consolidating niche industries and they frequently grow their platform companies through acquiring smaller “bolt-on” companies to broaden the product offering or geographic reach and profitably grow sales, to take advantage of the valuation arbitrage created by the “Size Premium” discussed below.

What do I need to know about financial buyers in the current market?

PEG’s raised over $1 tillion in the last boom cycle (2005-2008) and very little has been spent due to the recession and uncertainty of the economic bottom being reached.

Most PEG’s are limited liability partnerships with a 10-year life and the average midpoint of these funds is the end of 2012.  There are an increasing number of PEG’s and other financial buyers such as public investment corporations that are taking a longer-term view.  These PEG’s can have up to a 25-year life cycle and continue to invest through year 15.  Public Investment Companies have owned portfolio companies for more than four decades.

Since the average hold time for the majority of PEG’s has grown from 3 years to 5.2 years, the 10 year PEG’s must deploy their huge un-invested cash reserve prior to 2013 or risk having to return much of it to the limited partners.  This has created huge pressure to put this cash to work NOW!

“Size Premium” Value GAP has never been WIDER – Andy Greenberg, CEO of GF Data recently commented on pricing trends of US middle market deals:

“I noted that the “size premium” in private equity-sponsored middle market deals had never been wider than in the first quarter of 2011. Within the $10-250 million total enterprise value (TEV) range we cover, valuations averaged 5.4x at $10-50 million of TEV, 7.2x at $50-100 million and 8.5x at $100-250 million….”

SUMMARY & CONCLUSION: Who is the best buyer?

Strategic buyers can pay a high price for your company because they will rationalize the purchase by eliminating excess personnel, property, and facilities. As the owner, you may be asked to participate in an orderly transition period with no additional financial incentive.

Strategic buyers have $1.2 trillion available for acquisitions. However, PitchBook expects strategic buyer acquisitions to decrease in 2012.

Financial buyers/partners derive value by growing ‘platform’ companies with management into bigger companies to take advantage of the “SIZE PREMIUM” upon exit. Company culture is more likely to be kept and a financial buyer is eager to back excellent management teams that want to take some chips off the table today and have a second bite at the apple.

Financial buyers have extensive cash reserves, which will need to be invested in the near-term to meet the necessary investment horizons.

In today’s VERY uncertain economic times an owner considering an exit in the next decade should consider an equity recapitalization with a financial buyer (some will do non-control transactions) and take some chips of the table now while growing the company to a larger critical mass and take a Second Bite in five years.  Click here to see an example of how this scenario unfolded for Bob and his decision to do an equity recapitalization of his $25 million revenue value-add Distribution Company.

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as advice on any particular matter nor is it intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship.  For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com.

November 7, 2011

Is an EQUITY RECAP right for MY Company?

4 Nov

By:  Huxley Nixon

You frequently hear that Strategic Buyers always pay MORE than Financial Buyers but this is NOT the case if an Equity Recap is right for you and your company.  For business owners considering a sale of part or all of their company in the next decade but are not ready to retire or give up operational control today you will want to read further.  This structure allows owners to ease into their eventual exit by doing it in two steps over five to seven years. It also allows them to sleep better now by knowing they have converted a significant amount of their illiquid stock into cash, potentially eliminate their personal liability by transferring it to their new equity partner and have an opportunity for a second bite of the apple in the future.

What is an  Equity Recapitalization?

Also known as a Leveraged Equity Recapitalization.  It is a financial transaction where existing shareholders exchange 30% to 80% of their equity for cash with an outside financial investor like a Private Equity Group (“PEG”) that “re-capitalize” the balance sheet by infusing new equity and debt.  This structure allows the business owner to convert some their “illiquid” stock into cash today while maintaining a meaningful equity and operational interest in the company and participate in a second sale in five to seven years.

Benefits:

  • Liquidity – allows owner (and equity stakeholders) to diversify personal assets while maintaining a meaningful ownership position.
  • Management Continuity – Usually, new financial partner wants to leverage off of existing management and loyal employees to run the business.
  • Elimination of Personal Liability – When selling a majority equity position to a strong private equity partner it allows the business owner to shift the debt liability to the new equity partner, thus removing any requirement for personal guarantees.
  • Aids in Succession Planning -  helps provide a fair way for accommodating the disparate needs of family shareholders allowing the owner and the new controlling shareholder the opportunity to select the best candidate(s) to remain to lead the future growth.
  • Second Bite – Business owner(s) typically retain a significant equity position in the re-capitalized company and stands to generate a second liquidity event when the company is re-sold.  Depending on performance, this second payday can be larger than the initial transaction.
  • Experienced Growth-Oriented Financial Partner – brings access to financial resources and industry experts not available to owner.

EXAMPLE:

Bob, 65 years old and the owner of Zenith Distributors (“Zenith”), has spent his career building his value-add Distribution Company to $50 million in sales and EBITDA of $5 million.  Virtually all of his net worth is tied up in Zenith and the additional liability of his personal guarantee securing the company debt of $5 million has made Bob more risk averse.  He knows Zenith has great growth prospects in the next several years but when faced with an additional investment to capture these growth opportunities he is uncomfortable in increasing his personal risk profile.

Alex, CEO of BIG Guy Distributors, a subsidiary of a large public company that distributes products complementary to Zenith’s product line in a different geographic market wants to meet to discuss synergies between their companies.

Succession Issues

Bob meets with Alex and learns that they are interested in acquiring Zenith to increase their geographic reach.  Bob is NOT prepared for this conversation and says Zenith is “Not-For-Sale”.   However, this serendipitous overture forces Bob to think about his inevitable transition out of the business.  There are many important issues regarding a transition – for Bob, family shareholders and employees.

Bob has two children, Kevin and Sally, and both work in the business.  Bob owns 75% of the equity with each of the children owning 12.5%.  Kevin is the oldest but in Bob’s eyes is not capable to run the company. Sally is smart, aggressive, a natural leader and has earned the respect of employees, vendors and customers.  Sally wants to invest more into the business to expand their product line and geographic reach but Bob does not want to take on more risk at this stage in his career.

Bob retains a professional valuation firm to determine what his company is worth before continuing the dialogue with Alex.  This analysis determines his company’s total enterprise value (TEV) is $27.5 million.

Bob’s Dilemma

Bob re-engages with Alex and BIG Guy offers $30 million for Zenith.  It will become part of BIG Guy and post closing the services of Bob, Kevin and Sally will no longer be needed.   Zenith has become Bob’s identity and he does not have any outside interest or hobbies.  Alex’s offer price is $2.5 million higher than expected but Bob has NO idea of what he will do with his time post closing.   Bob decides he must seek advice from someone who has faced these issues so he calls John, a trusted mentor who sold his company five years earlier.

Having Your Cake and Eating It

After hearing Bob’s story and fears, John suggested Zenith is an excellent candidate for a Leveraged Equity Recap.  He suggested several respected private equity firms that target family owned business where the owner is not ready to retire but want to De-Risk their personal financial picture by converting a significant portion of their illiquid stock into cash while retaining operational control and having an opportunity for a second bite-of-the-apple in the future.

Bob put his discussions with Alex on hold and takes John’s advice and contacted several private equity firms he recommended.  Bob “clicked” with the partners and management philosophy at ABC Equity Partners.  They also were very impressed with Sally and want her to remain in top management with Bob post closing.

Bob’s Options

OPTION A

Accept Alex’s seemingly generous offer and sell 100% of Zenith to BIG Guy and retire.  This would provide Bob and his children the following economic benefits but none of the family would be involved with the company post closing and Zenith would be absorbed into BIG Guy’s.

Sale to BIG Guy’s Distributors, Inc.

Pre-TAX (000′s)

SALES PRICE -                      $30,000  (6 X EBITDA)

Less Debt -                              $5,000__

NET Proceeds -                     $25,000

(Cash Split: Bob – $18.75 MM, Kevin & Sally $3.125 MM each)

OPTION B

ABC Equity Partners offers to partner with Bob and Sally to recapitalize Zenith and arrive at a valuation of $27.5 million (5.5 X EBITDA). They want Bob and Sally to continue to lead the company post closing but do not feel Kevin is a fit to help grow the company.  It is determined that the company can comfortably support $17.5 million of debt (3.5 x EBITDA) leaving an Equity requirement of $10 millionABC invests $6 million in equity for 60% of the Re-capitalized Zenith (“NEWCO”) and Bob and Sally invest collectively $4 million for a 40% equity interest and will remain to execute the growth plan created by ABC and Bob’s management team.  Kevin elects to sell 100% of his shares and pursue other interests.

ABC Leverage Equity Recap of Zenith Distributors, Inc.

Pre-TAX (000′s)

Zenith Value -                                $27,500          100%

Less DEBT -                                      $5,000_

Pre-NEWCO Proceeds -              $22,500

(Cash Split: Bob – $16.875 MM, Kevin & Sally – $2.8125 MM each)

NEWCO Capital Structure

New DEBT                                        $17,500           63%

New EQUITY

ABC  (60%)        $6,000

Bob    (30%)       $3,000

Sally  (10%)       $1,000             _________

TOTAL EQUITY                          $10,000          37%

TOTAL CAPITAL                        $27,500          100%

(Post NEWCO Cash Split: Bob – $13.875 MM, Kevin – $2.8125 MM, Sally – $1.8125 MM)

Assuming Zenith is SOLD in 5 years and Sales and EBITDA have grown 10% annually at the end of year 5 they will be approximately $82.3 million and $8.2 million respectfully.  A debt balance of approximately $5.4 million remains.  After speaking with multiple interested buyers, Zenith is sold to BIG Guy Distributors for $59 million (7.2 X EBITDA).

Sale of NEWCO 

Pre-TAX (000′s)

SALES PRICE                                   $59,000  (7.2 X EBITDA)

Less Outstanding DEBT                 $5,400__

NET EQUITY                                    $53,640          100%

ABC    (60%)        $32,184

Bob     (30%)        $16,092

Sally    (10%)        $5,364                  ______

TOTAL EQUITY                               $53,640          100%

CONCLUSION:

OPTION A                   OPTION B                                DIFFERENCE______

$25,000       vs          $39,956                      $17,956 (increase of 60%)

(Net PROCEEDS  (000′s) to Family shareholders, pre-tax & before any transaction fees due)

OPTION B – WINNER in a Landslide!

  • At the initial Recap Bob was able to take $13.875 million ($16.875 M – $3 M invested in NEWCO) off the table to do some estate planning and diversify his portfolio + no personal guarantee was required on the company debt + he owned a 30% equity interest in NEWCO resulting in an additional equity payment of $16.09 million upon its sale + he continued to run his company for five more years (which allowed him the time to emotionally prepare for the inevitable separation from it and the employees who were like family).
  • Bob was able to create a fair solution to SUCCESSION issues created by having one child who was not well suited for the business and the other who had proven their leadership and ability to perform.
  • NEWCO benefits from a valuation bump due to the “Size Premium” – NEWCO’s TEV has grown from $27.5 million to $59 million at sale date.  Click here to read more.
  • LASTLY, Bob and his Family received a total pre-tax (and pre transaction fees) payment for their Equity of $39,956,000!  Almost 60% more by NOT selling out at the higher price offered initially by a Strategic Buyer!

Author: Huxley Nixon has been involved in M&A (mergers and acquisitions) for 35 years as a buyer, seller and intermediary.  He is founder of the M&A MARKETPLACE by CHC (www.mamarketplace.com) where the buyer pays all success fees and the process is only 120 days.  For owners of private companies considering a sale of part or all of their company – it provides a very quick, confidential and competitive alternative to current options less transparent and more disruptive for the owner.

DISCLAIMER:  The example above is a fictitious transaction and is intended only to illustrate how an equity recap works and demonstrate its potential benefits based on the facts assumed in the analysis.  Opinions and conclusions in this post are solely those of the author unless otherwise indicated.  This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as advice on any particular matter nor is it intended to be a solicitation regarding any securities transaction and or investment relationship.  For those desiring additional information please visit our website www.mamarketplace.com.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.